Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
en:blog:2019:2019-09-04 [2019-09-05 15:30] Decomo |
en:blog:2019:2019-09-04 [2019-09-05 15:41] Decomo |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
It seems a switching chip is Marvell 98DX8332. This switch might also support 2.5GbE and 5GbE although MikroTik doesn' | It seems a switching chip is Marvell 98DX8332. This switch might also support 2.5GbE and 5GbE although MikroTik doesn' | ||
- | The switch supports dual boot of RouterOS and SwOS, so it can do L3 processing to some extent. Having said that, the processes which aren't handled by the chip are processed by CPU, and what is worse, an internal bandwidth between them is only 1Gbps. Therefore, we had better use it as plain L2 switch, or should keep lightweight L3 usage such as connecting to WAN with simple packet filtering. Otherwise its valuable performance will be completely dead. Fortunately it has enough 10GbE ports, so I think fit to pass on the L3 processes to a superior | + | The switch supports dual boot of RouterOS and SwOS, so it can do L3 processing to some extent. Having said that, the processes which aren't handled by the chip are processed by CPU, and what is worse, an internal bandwidth between them is only 1Gbps. Therefore, we had better use it as plain L2 switch, or should keep lightweight L3 usage such as connecting to WAN with simple packet filtering. Otherwise its valuable performance will be completely dead. Fortunately it has enough 10GbE ports, so I think fit to pass on the L3 processes to a dedicated |